Informacje o albumie Genius Casebook: Con Law autorstwa Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg
sobota 23 listopad 2024 to data wydania Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg nowego albumu zatytułowanego Genius Casebook: Con Law.
Album składa się z 111 piosenek. Możesz kliknąć na utwory, aby zobaczyć odpowiadające im teksty i tłumaczenia:
Oto mała lista piosenek, które Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg może zdecydować się zaśpiewać, wraz z nazwą odpowiedniego albumu dla każdej piosenki:
- United States v. Carlene Products
- Gonzales v. Raich
- Maine v. Taylor
- Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.
- National League of Cities v. Usery
- Martin v. Hunter's Lessee
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey
- McCulloch v. Maryland
- Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
- South Dakota v. Dole
- Rasul v. Bush
- Hamdan v. Rumsfeld
- Lawrence v. Texas (Majority & Concurrence)
- United Mine Workers of America v. Coronado Coal Company (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Dissent)
- Philadelphia v. New Jersey
- Powell v. McCormack
- Bush v. Gore
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Dissent)
- Gregory v. Ashcroft
- Snyder v. Phelps
- United States v. Morrison
- Dredd Scott v. Sanford
- United States v. Darby
- Katzenbach v. Morgan
- Department of Agriculture v. Moreno
- University of California Regents v. Bakke
- Civil Rights Cases
- Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah, Florida
- Bolling v. Sharpe
- Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan
- Printz v. United States
- INS v. Chadha
- U.S. Term Limits v. Thorton
- Plessy v. Ferguson
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Business v. Sebelius
- Gratz v. Bollinger
- Washington v. Davis
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (Concurrence)
- Stafford v. Wallace
- Reno v. Condon
- Katzenbach v. McClung
- United States v. Virginia
- Wickard v. Filburn
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking Authority
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. Irvis
- New York v. United States
- Hollingsworth v. Perry
- A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States
- Roe v. Wade
- Hans v. Louisiana
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
- Romer v. Evans
- Friends of Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.
- Swift & Co. v. United States
- Korematsu v. United States
- United States v. Windsor
- DeFunis v. Odegaard
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer
- McCullen v. Coakley
- Fisher vs. University of Texas et al.
- Shelley v. Kraemer
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co. (Excerpt for Con Law)
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority
- Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc.
- Texas v. Johnson
- Morrison v. Olson
- Hammer v. Dagenhart
- NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
- Ex Parte Milligan
- Champion v. Ames
- Richmond v. JA Croson Co.
- Baker v. Carr
- Grutter v. Bollinger
- City of Boerne v. Flores
- Ex Parte Quirin
- United States v. Lopez
- Honig v. Doe
- Bowers v. Hardwick
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Okla., Inc.
- Marbury v. Madison
- Nixon v. Fitzgerald
- Shelby County v. Holder
- Clinton v. Jones
- The Slaughterhouse Cases
- Miller v. California
- Houston Texas Railway v. U.S. (Shreveport Rate Cases)
- Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
- Cooper v. Aaron
- Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
- Brown v. Board of Education (II)
- Nat'l Federation of Indep. Businesses v. Sebelius (Concurrence/Dissent)
- Alden v. Maine
- Loving v. Virginia
- Parents Involved v. Seattle School District No. 1 (School desegregation case)
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Servs.
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.
- Hirabiyashi v. United States
- Trunk v. City of San Diego
- Ex Parte McCardle
- Missouri v. Jenkins
- Seminole Tribe of Fla. v. Florida
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby: Majority
- Nixon v. United States
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. Nelson
- United States v. E.C. Knight Co.
- Ex Parte Young
- Marsh v. Alabama
- Pierce v. Society of Sisters
- Gibbons v. Ogden
- Brown v. Board of Education
